The board began buzzing about VPI’s offense during the Notre Dame game.
Including the ND game, both teams are 3-1, and on three-game winning streaks.
Two teams, two sets of offensive stats.
Team A:
129 pts (32.2/ game)
1,429 yds (357.3/game)
67 first downs (16.8/game)
13-52 3rd down conversions (25%)
4-6 4th down conversions (67%)
5 TOs (1.3/game)
131:53 TOP (32:58/game)
Team B:
147 pts (36.8/game)
1,740 yds (435.0/game)
96 first downs (24.0/game)
29-58 3rd down conversions (50%)
4-6 4th down conversions (67%)
2 TOs (0.5/game)
137:19 TOP (34:20/game)
Would you be surprised to learn that Team B is Anae’s unimaginative bunch?
(Take out Louisviille and Notre Dame, and the deltas don’t really change.)
For VPI they become:
36.3, 398.0, 18.3, 25%, 60%, 3 TO, 34:22
For the Hoos:
42.0, 476.3, 26.0, 57%, 50%, 0 TO, 35:52
Defenses are definitely in VPI’s favor.
Including the ND game, both teams are 3-1, and on three-game winning streaks.
Two teams, two sets of offensive stats.
Team A:
129 pts (32.2/ game)
1,429 yds (357.3/game)
67 first downs (16.8/game)
13-52 3rd down conversions (25%)
4-6 4th down conversions (67%)
5 TOs (1.3/game)
131:53 TOP (32:58/game)
Team B:
147 pts (36.8/game)
1,740 yds (435.0/game)
96 first downs (24.0/game)
29-58 3rd down conversions (50%)
4-6 4th down conversions (67%)
2 TOs (0.5/game)
137:19 TOP (34:20/game)
Would you be surprised to learn that Team B is Anae’s unimaginative bunch?
(Take out Louisviille and Notre Dame, and the deltas don’t really change.)
For VPI they become:
36.3, 398.0, 18.3, 25%, 60%, 3 TO, 34:22
For the Hoos:
42.0, 476.3, 26.0, 57%, 50%, 0 TO, 35:52
Defenses are definitely in VPI’s favor.
Last edited:
